PT
Protagonist Therapeutics, Inc (PTGX)·Q1 2025 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Q1 2025 printed license and collaboration revenue of $28.321M and diluted EPS of -$0.19, cycling an unusually strong prior-year quarter that recognized $254.953M from the Takeda upfront, driving a YoY decline and GAAP net loss of $11.655M .
- Versus S&P Global consensus, PTGX missed: revenue $28.321M vs $30.444M* and EPS -$0.19 vs -$0.002* (9 estimates each); lumpy license recognition timing appears to be the primary driver of the variance .
- Operationally, the quarter was strong: rusfertide Phase 3 VERIFY met the primary and all key secondary endpoints (p<0.0001), selected for ASCO plenary; icotrokinra delivered positive Phase 2b UC topline and Phase 3 psoriasis presentations; cash reached $697.9M with runway through at least end-2028 .
- Near-term stock catalysts: ASCO plenary (June 1) and investor call (June 2) to discuss rusfertide, plus NDA filings targeted by year-end for late-stage partnered assets .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
What Went Well
- Rusfertide VERIFY met its primary endpoint and all four key secondary endpoints with highly significant p-values (p<0.0001), and was selected for ASCO plenary—strong clinical validation and visibility .
- Icotrokinra showed positive topline in ANTHEM-UC Phase 2b and delivered late-breaking Phase 3 ICONIC-LEAD psoriasis data at AAD and pediatric cohort at WCPD, reinforcing breadth across immunology indications .
- Management emphasized momentum toward year-end NDA filings and highlighted robust liquidity to independently advance preclinical assets (including PN-881 IL-17) into PoC studies: “Protagonist is off to a very strong 2025… progressing to NDA filings by year end… strong cash position” .
What Went Wrong
- Revenue and EPS both missed consensus (revenue $28.321M vs $30.444M*; EPS -$0.19 vs -$0.002*), reflecting the absence of last year’s large upfront license recognition and partial milestone proportional recognition in Q1 2025 .
- GAAP net loss of $11.655M contrasts with Q1 2024’s GAAP net income of $207.340M; operating margin compressed sharply on lower license recognition this quarter .
- R&D rose YoY (to $35.893M from $33.734M) on increased preclinical/discovery spend, while rusfertide VERIFY costs tapered; G&A normalized from prior-year legal/advisory fees but higher stock-based comp partially offset the decline .
Financial Results
P&L comparison (oldest → newest)
Margins (computed from reported figures; oldest → newest)
Revenue composition (Q1 2025)
Balance sheet KPIs
Estimates comparison (Q1 2025)
Values retrieved from S&P Global.*
Guidance Changes
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Note: No Q1 2025 earnings call transcript available in our document set; company will host an investor call June 2 to discuss ASCO plenary rusfertide data .
Management Commentary
- “Protagonist is off to a very strong 2025 with multiple transformational events in the first quarter for our two late-stage partnered assets, rusfertide and icotrokinra which are progressing to NDA filings by year end… We are fortunate to be in a very strong cash position, allowing us to independently and rapidly progress our early-stage pipeline into value-creating clinical safety and proof-of-concept studies starting with PN-881 in 2025.” — Dinesh V. Patel, Ph.D., President & CEO .
- VERIFY results summary: met primary endpoint (clinical responders weeks 20–32) and all four key secondary endpoints (EU phlebotomy rate, hematocrit control, PROMIS Fatigue, MFSAF TSS-7); safety consistent with prior studies; plenary selection at ASCO .
- Icotrokinra: positive Phase 2b ANTHEM-UC topline and Phase 3 psoriasis data presentations; further data and conference disclosures expected later in 2025 .
Q&A Highlights
- No formal Q1 2025 earnings call transcript available. Company scheduled an investor call on June 2 (8 AM EDT) to discuss rusfertide ASCO plenary data; dial-in details and webcast provided .
- Anticipated focus areas: VERIFY efficacy endpoints and safety, NDA filing plans/timing, U.S. co-commercialization economics with Takeda, icotrokinra development plans in UC and psoriasis, and prioritization across preclinical oral programs .
Estimates Context
- Q1 2025 revenue $28.321M vs consensus $30.444M* → MISS; Q1 2025 EPS -$0.19 vs consensus -$0.002* → MISS. Both variances are consistent with lumpy license recognition timing: Q1 included $22.8M proportional recognition of a $25M milestone (payable post VERIFY CSR) plus $5.5M of development services, versus Q1 2024’s large upfront recognition under the Takeda agreement .
- Street models may need to recalibrate cadence of license/milestone recognition and expense trajectory (preclinical ramp, lower rusfertide trial costs post-readout), pending ASCO plenary details and NDA timelines .
Values retrieved from S&P Global.*
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Clinical catalysts are the dominant narrative: VERIFY plenary at ASCO and the June 2 investor call should shape near-term sentiment and regulatory expectations for rusfertide .
- Icotrokinra’s expanding data set (UC positive topline; psoriasis Phase 3) supports multi-indication optionality with partner-led late-stage development; watch for full UC dataset later in 2025 .
- Financials are inherently lumpy given license/milestone accounting; consensus misses reflect timing mechanics rather than demand—focus on total deal economics (Takeda/JNJ) and NDA path .
- Liquidity is a strength: $697.9M cash provides runway through at least end-2028 and enables internal advancement of oral programs to PoC without near-term financing risk .
- Expect operating expense mix to evolve: R&D up on preclinical/discovery; G&A normalized from prior advisory/legal fees but higher stock comp persists .
- If ASCO plenary and subsequent disclosures are well-received, estimate revisions could shift from near-term GAAP cadence to medium-term commercialization scenarios—monitor partner decisions (e.g., profit-share vs opt-out economics) that affect value capture .
- Near-term trading setup: elevated event risk around ASCO plenary and the June 2 call; position sizing should reflect binary headline risk and potential for narrative inflection tied to regulatory/label dynamics for PV .